C++ Logo

SG14

Advanced search

Subject: Re: Challenging the deprecation of volatile compound statements
From: Paul M. Bendixen (paulbendixen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-02-17 19:36:24


So I've tried to incorporate the feedback given.
I know I can have a tendency to ramble a bit in text so if the
proposal is still not clear enough, please let me know.

I've added a single example of usage in a library "from the wild", if
further examples are required, I would like to know were they might
fit.

I haven't added the "what do we expect from atomicity of compound
expressions" section, as I frankly do no know what to expect other
than it not breaking the hal that is often times _more_ important than
the standard library.

I'm still looking for any feedback this group may have.

Best
Paul

Den man. 15. feb. 2021 kl. 02.07 skrev Paul M. Bendixen
<paulbendixen_at_[hidden]>:
>
> Thank you very much for the feedback, as this is the first time I've
> tried this, I welcome any help.
>
> Michael, yes I'll need a number, but 2021 02 15 seems very optimistic.
>
> I have already put Wouter on and would like to have any input he could
> provide. I am updating the proposal but haven't updated enough to put
> it out again (I have added examples though and noted places where the
> prose needs to be improved.
>
> /Paul
>
> Den fre. 12. feb. 2021 kl. 18.50 skrev Arthur O'Dwyer via SG14
> <sg14_at_[hidden]>:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:44 PM Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/02/2021 17.36, Arthur O'Dwyer via SG14 wrote:
> >> > Again, the null hypothesis is that this never happens, and we'd have to see some concrete examples from real codebases in order to provide evidence against the null hypothesis.
> >>
> >> The argument was that there are plenty of C header files from
> >> embedded system vendors that do this, and we want C++ to be
> >> compatible in this regard.
> >>
> >> I hope we can quote from such header files without much effort.
> >
> >
> > Right, but the null hypothesis is that this never happens, and we'd have to [quote from such header files] in order to provide evidence against the null hypothesis.
> > If that's easy, then awesome: let's see it in the paper.
> >
> > –Arthur
> > _______________________________________________
> > SG14 mailing list
> > SG14_at_[hidden]
> > https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14
>
>
>
> --
> • − − •/• −/• • −/• − • •/− • • •/•/− •/− • •/• •/− • • −/•/− •/• − −
> •− •/− − •/− −/• −/• •/• − • •/• − • − • −/− • − •/− − −/− −//

-- 
• − − •/• −/• • −/• − • •/− • • •/•/− •/− • •/• •/− • • −/•/− •/• − −
•− •/− − •/− −/• −/• •/• − • •/• − • − • −/− • − •/− − −/− −//



SG14 list run by sg14-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Older Archives on Google Groups