C++ Logo

SG14

Advanced search

Subject: Re: Colony current status + question
From: Matt Bentley (mattreecebentley_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-11-10 22:57:23


Ah I see, makes sense.

On 10/11/2020 11:10 am, Billy Baker wrote:
> The library evolution backlog is reviewed frequently. We do have to
> prioritize based on https://wg21.link/P592 <https://wg21.link/P592>. The
> upcoming holidays will slow some things down. Having the updated paper
> in the next mailing helps.
>
> Billy
> SG18 LEWG(I) chair
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:23 PM Matt Bentley <mattreecebentley_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:mattreecebentley_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> Thanks, my current version would be going out with the 15 Nov mailing,
> so probably unsurprising that it hasn't shown up there (I think?).
>
> How does one go about getting a paper on a review schedule? Or is that
> just down to specific individuals? The whole process seems
> mystifying to
> me. Cheers for mentioning that to Corentin & Inbal-
>
> On 10/11/2020 5:38 am, Billy Baker wrote:
> > colony is currently unscheduled in the LEWG mailing list. See
> > https://github.com/cplusplus/LEWG/wiki/2020-Mailing-List-Reviews
> <https://github.com/cplusplus/LEWG/wiki/2020-Mailing-List-Reviews>
> > <https://github.com/cplusplus/LEWG/wiki/2020-Mailing-List-Reviews
> <https://github.com/cplusplus/LEWG/wiki/2020-Mailing-List-Reviews>>. I
> > asked that Corentin or Inbal reach out to make sure that when a
> review
> > does occur it uses a revision that has the changes that you have
> been
> > working on.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 3:15 PM Matt Bentley via SG14
> > <sg14_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg14_at_[hidden]>
> <mailto:sg14_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg14_at_[hidden]>>> wrote:
> >
> >     Thanks Patrice. New times indeed :)
> >
> >     On 9/11/2020 9:48 am, Patrice Roy wrote:
> >      > We have a plenary tomorrow (for me), November 9. It will
> be the
> >     first
> >      > virtual plenary I attend, and if I understand correctly it
> will
> >     also be
> >      > the first virtual plenary session ever. We're all
> discovering the
> >     ways
> >      > in which to do things today.
> >      >
> >      > Expect "Colony v. now" to pass through LEWG at least once,
> >     followed by
> >      > written discussions, and if all goes well, at some point reach
> >     LWG and
> >      > land in a plenary after that. The fact that Jens has
> helped will
> >     be an
> >      > asset here, being the master wordsmith that he is.
> >      >
> >      > Cheers!
> >      >
> >      > Le dim. 8 nov. 2020 à 15:41, Matthew Bentley via SG14
> >      > <sg14_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg14_at_[hidden]>
> <mailto:sg14_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg14_at_[hidden]>>
> >     <mailto:sg14_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg14_at_[hidden]>
> <mailto:sg14_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg14_at_[hidden]>>>> a
> écrit :
> >      >
> >      >     Hi all,
> >      >     have the current version of the proposal in for the
> next mailing
> >      >     (and uploaded to the SG14 github),
> >      >     version v6.01 of the reference implementation has been
> released
> >      >     (plflib.org/colony.htm <http://plflib.org/colony.htm>
> <http://plflib.org/colony.htm <http://plflib.org/colony.htm>>
> >     <http://plflib.org/colony.htm <http://plflib.org/colony.htm>
> <http://plflib.org/colony.htm <http://plflib.org/colony.htm>>>) which
> >     matches
> >      >     the existing proposal fully now.
> >      >     The fully-functional reserve() has been well-received,
> with some
> >      >     people reporting they held off using it because of the
> lack
> >     of that
> >      >     feature. So I think that was a good call overall, even if
> >     there are
> >      >     some GCC9/10 compiler issues relating to performance.
> >      >
> >      >     Jens has gone through and given me another critique of
> tech
> >     spec of
> >      >     the prev version, which has been integrated. There's a
> few more
> >      >     questions which I've put in the current versions
> 'questions
> >     for the
> >      >     committee' section, so if anyone has the time to take
> a look
> >     at the
> >      >     github ver they're welcome to give feedback here.
> >      >
> >      >     Otherwise was just looking for some general clarification
> >     around the
> >      >     standardisation process in the age of Covid-19,
> Michael noted
> >     that
> >      >     face to face WG meetings are banned currently, but is
> >      >     standardisation still happening/progressing in the
> absence of the
> >      >     F2F meetings? And what form does that take? Kinda out
> of the
> >     loop here-
> >      >     Thanks in advance,
> >      >     Matt
> >      >     _______________________________________________
> >      >     SG14 mailing list
> >      > SG14_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG14_at_[hidden]>
> <mailto:SG14_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG14_at_[hidden]>>
> >     <mailto:SG14_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG14_at_[hidden]>
> <mailto:SG14_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG14_at_[hidden]>>>
> >      > https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14>
> >     <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14>>
> >      >     <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14>
> >     <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14>>>
> >      >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     SG14 mailing list
> > SG14_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG14_at_[hidden]>
> <mailto:SG14_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG14_at_[hidden]>>
> > https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14>
> >     <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg14>>
> >
>


SG14 list run by sg14-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Older Archives on Google Groups