C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG14] Colony Reserve update

From: Matthew Bentley <mattreecebentley_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 11:21:40 +1200
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 08:58, Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Thanks for trying this out.
> Please make sure the below rationale for omitting "reserve"
> is in the prose part of the next update of your paper.
> (prose part = any part other than the to-be normative wording)
> Future generations (such as reviewers in LEWG) should be
> able to find out why "reserve" isn't available.

Sure, will document the decision and rationale, regardless of what the
eventual conclusion is from subsequent testing.

Received on 2020-08-04 18:25:43