I would strongly advise you *against* writing such a proposal without first writing a rationale and overview of the technical approach and its trade offs. Choosing a particular implementation without doing what I suggest will likely be a waste of time.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 5:35 AM Robin Rowe via SG13 <sg13@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

Thank you everyone for the feedback! Interesting.

Herb has advised that my first step should be to write a proposal. I've
collaborated with ISO before and understand the process. The proposal I
am planning is different from the past Cairo/PDF-inspired proposal. I am
thinking of proposing to make FLTK the C++ GUI standard. I will ask on
the FLTK list how folks there feel about it.

To both write a proposal and participate in committee meetings may be
more ambitious than what I can give now. I won't make it in-person to
the committee meeting in Seattle next week.

If I will draft the proposal, who would like to team with me to handle
the committee process?

Best,

Rob
--
Robin Rowe, CTO
HeroicRobots.com
323-535-0952 (Los Angeles)
Tech blog: goshrobin.com

--
SG13 mailing list
SG13@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg13