Subject: Re: [isocpp-core] New Issue?: [class.bit] p.4 - silent UB and necessary restriction?
From: Peter C++ (peter.cpp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-02-05 09:56:24
That is exactly what we are asking for.
sent from a mobile device so please excuse strange words due to autocorrection.
+41-79-432 23 32
> On 5 Feb 2021, at 15:54, Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> We could make the "compare equal" sentence a bit more useful
> if we said that the bit-field just needs to be wide enough
> to hold the particular value that was stored, not all values.
SG12 list run by email@example.com