Subject: Re: [ub] C provenance semantics proposal
From: Freek Wiedijk (freek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-04-13 05:07:09
>So, it seems the opinion of WG14 in C DR 260 is at odds with the current
>normative text. Maybe WG14 wants to revisit and update C DR 260, at
>least with a marker "obsolete" or so.
I thought that after the C standard gets a new version,
the DR's before that automatically become "obsolete",
because they are supposed to have been integrated in the
standard after that?
SG12 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com