Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 20:15:58 +0800
On Sun Sep 21 14:27:43 CEST 2014, Jens Maurer wrote:
> On 09/18/2014 09:42 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> > FYI, this is core issue 504:
> >
> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#504
>
> ... which doesn't necessarily mean it will be automatically addressed by CWG
> in the near future.
>
> Feel free to write a short paper suggesting specific wording changes to address
> this issue. (Or, if just 1-2 sentence, send your wording changes to Mike Miller
> if you won't attend WG21 meetings in person.)
Understood. I will write some proposed wording here in the hope that
someone might give feedback. In [dcl.init.ref] I would add a clause:
> On 09/18/2014 09:42 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> > FYI, this is core issue 504:
> >
> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#504
>
> ... which doesn't necessarily mean it will be automatically addressed by CWG
> in the near future.
>
> Feel free to write a short paper suggesting specific wording changes to address
> this issue. (Or, if just 1-2 sentence, send your wording changes to Mike Miller
> if you won't attend WG21 meetings in person.)
Understood. I will write some proposed wording here in the hope that
someone might give feedback. In [dcl.init.ref] I would add a clause:
--- The initializer shall not mention the reference being initialized. Any use of a reference which has not yet been initialized is ill-formed. --- I currently have no plans to attend WG21 meetings, but appreciate your time here. John Zwinck
Received on 2014-09-22 14:16:19