Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:10:21 +0000
Hi,
The recent (and ongoing) discussion on the lifetime of objects of type at the intersection of C and C++ (what we used to call POD) looked at various aspects of C's notion 'effective type'. Here is one defect filled against it:
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n1762.htm
Please note that it is for the C committee to decide. I am mentioning it here only to the extent that 'effective type' is part of what we are looking at.
-- Gaby
The recent (and ongoing) discussion on the lifetime of objects of type at the intersection of C and C++ (what we used to call POD) looked at various aspects of C's notion 'effective type'. Here is one defect filled against it:
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n1762.htm
Please note that it is for the C committee to decide. I am mentioning it here only to the extent that 'effective type' is part of what we are looking at.
-- Gaby
Received on 2014-02-21 18:10:32