Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:11:16 +0200
On 22 January 2014 02:55, David Krauss <david_work_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 1. Violation of “shall” is diagnosable unless otherwise specified (1.4/1).
Ok. I don't think this is obviously clear.
> 2. I would take “use” to mean ODR-use.
I wouldn't, I would take "use" to mean any use, not just odr-use.
> 3. Far as I know, the implementation is allowed to perform dynamic initialization of globals in main. So for all intents and purposes, it’s not really usable as a function because its body doesn’t describe what it does.
Well, apparently some implementations think they can get away with it
under the auspices
of undefined behavior. :)
> 1. Violation of “shall” is diagnosable unless otherwise specified (1.4/1).
Ok. I don't think this is obviously clear.
> 2. I would take “use” to mean ODR-use.
I wouldn't, I would take "use" to mean any use, not just odr-use.
> 3. Far as I know, the implementation is allowed to perform dynamic initialization of globals in main. So for all intents and purposes, it’s not really usable as a function because its body doesn’t describe what it does.
Well, apparently some implementations think they can get away with it
under the auspices
of undefined behavior. :)
Received on 2014-01-22 02:11:17