C++ Logo

sg10

Advanced search

Re: [isocpp-lib] Feature-test macro collision

From: Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 12:21:46 -0500
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 11:51 AM Jeff Garland via Lib <lib_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sep 7, 2022, at 6:00 AM, Steve Downey via Lib <lib_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
> An NB comment to fix an issue isn't something to worry about. It's not as
> if they're a score. It's a list of things someone things someone thinks
> that should be dealt with before release.
>
>
> Not worried about it — just trying to save people time on an issue we’re
> going to just resolve anyway.
>
>
> Apply all P0 issues is probably going to be there, too.
>
> If we think this is P0, we should probably make that official.
>
>
> From the link Tim sent, it’s already done — this will get moved at Kona
> pleanary.
>
> *[2022-08-23; Reflector poll]*
>
> Set status to Tentatively Ready after 12 votes in favour during reflector
> poll.
>

This is already reflected in SD-FeatureTest:
https://isocpp.org/std/standing-documents/sd-6-sg10-feature-test-recommendations#__cpp_lib_format

Barry

>

Received on 2022-09-07 17:22:01