Aha, thanks -- yes, if the macros are normative, then it might indeed be
best if we resolve this four-fold value bump collision with an LWG issue
that captures the discussion.

Thomas

On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 01:35, Jeff Garland via Lib <lib_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sep 6, 2022, at 4:58 PM, Jeff Garland via Lib <lib_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
> So if we’re not going to treat the addition of the macro as normative
>
>
> Ugh sorry — that should have said — “if we’re going to” — strike the not.
> _______________________________________________
> Lib mailing list
> Lib_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2022/09/23604.php
>