Aha, thanks -- yes, if the macros are normative, then it might indeed be best if we resolve this four-fold value bump collision with an LWG issue that captures the discussion.


On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 01:35, Jeff Garland via Lib <lib@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

On Sep 6, 2022, at 4:58 PM, Jeff Garland via Lib <lib@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

So if we’re not going to treat the addition of the macro as normative 

Ugh sorry — that should have said — “if we’re going to” — strike the not.
Lib mailing list
Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib
Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2022/09/23604.php