Seems fine to me

From: SG10 <sg10-bounces_at_[hidden].org> On Behalf Of Barry Revzin via SG10
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:18 AM
To: sg10_at_[hidden]; C++ Core Language Working Group <core_at_[hidden]>
Cc: Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]>; Cameron DaCamara <Cameron.DaCamara_at_[hidden]>; Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SG10] Missing feature test macros for C++20 core papers

Hey all,

Just following up on this since I haven't heard anything. This paper has since been published and can be now be found here: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2493r0.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2493r0.html__;!!FbZ0ZwI3Qg!_Z9Q4zm9UxAh-rPy9y7k_4UmpvqMou9s7u5MHSMrm1QYj0Ko9Vdg19qm3wiy$>

Thanks,

Barry

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:38 AM Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]<mailto:barry.revzin_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
Hey all,

Here is a new paper for the November mailing detailing some missing feature test macros as pointed out by Jonathan Wakely on the SG10 list and implementing Richard Smith's suggestion on how to resolve it: https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2493R0.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isocpp.org/files/papers/P2493R0.html__;!!FbZ0ZwI3Qg!_Z9Q4zm9UxAh-rPy9y7k_4UmpvqMou9s7u5MHSMrm1QYj0Ko9Vdg14OlJWN6$>

One of these changes (for __cpp_constexpr) isn't even a change to the working draft, and is solely a change to SD-FeatureTest (SD-6).

Thanks,

Barry

PS. I'm not sure who the right list of implementers is to CC for each compiler, please forward as appropriate to the right people.