Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:17:57 -0600
Hey all,
Just following up on this since I haven't heard anything. This paper has
since been published and can be now be found here:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2493r0.html
Thanks,
Barry
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:38 AM Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Here is a new paper for the November mailing detailing some missing
> feature test macros as pointed out by Jonathan Wakely on the SG10 list and
> implementing Richard Smith's suggestion on how to resolve it:
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2493R0.html
>
> One of these changes (for __cpp_constexpr) isn't even a change to the
> working draft, and is solely a change to SD-FeatureTest (SD-6).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Barry
>
> PS. I'm not sure who the right list of implementers is to CC for each
> compiler, please forward as appropriate to the right people.
>
Just following up on this since I haven't heard anything. This paper has
since been published and can be now be found here:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2493r0.html
Thanks,
Barry
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:38 AM Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Here is a new paper for the November mailing detailing some missing
> feature test macros as pointed out by Jonathan Wakely on the SG10 list and
> implementing Richard Smith's suggestion on how to resolve it:
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2493R0.html
>
> One of these changes (for __cpp_constexpr) isn't even a change to the
> working draft, and is solely a change to SD-FeatureTest (SD-6).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Barry
>
> PS. I'm not sure who the right list of implementers is to CC for each
> compiler, please forward as appropriate to the right people.
>
Received on 2021-12-08 10:18:12