On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:25 AM Arthur O'Dwyer via SG10 <
sg10_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> At the EWG telecon today, I was convinced that P2266 "Simpler implicit
> move" <https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2266R1.html> needs a feature-test
> macro.
>
> My question is, what should this feature-test macro's name be? I asked
> EWG for suggestions and the answer was "not here, go ask SG10."
>
> I propose
> #define __cpp_simpler_implicit_move [whatever]
>
> where my understanding is that `[whatever]` will end up being set to the
> date of the paper's adoption into the working draft.
>
> Ship it? Or does anyone have relevant thoughts on naming?
>

I think a name with a comparative ("simpler") will age badly. I'd suggest
we either call this __cpp_implicit_move, or perhaps bump the value
of __cpp_rvalue_references.


> –Arthur
> --
> SG10 mailing list
> SG10_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
>