C++ Logo

SG10

Advanced search

Subject: Macros in Prague Straw Polls Page
From: Barry Revzin (barry.revzin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-02-14 07:14:45


Hi SG10,

What does the group think of the following papers.

"Safe integral comparisons"
http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21prague/StrawPolls/P0586R2.html
> In [version.syn] add the feature test macro __cpp_lib_cmp_equal // also
defined in <utility>.
The paper introduces 7 functions, one of which is cmp_equal. Should the
macro be __cpp_lib_safe_integral_comparisons?

"Improving the Return Value of Erase-Like Algorithms II:Freeerase/eraseif"
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1115r3.pdf
This paper suggests no new feature test macro, but affects the return type
of some functions introduced by the free erase/erase_if paper, should it
bump the __cpp_lib_erase_if macro value?

Thanks,

Barry



SG10 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com