C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17?
From: Jonathan Wakely (cxx_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-02 10:45:20

Looks good to me.

On 29 September 2017 at 01:12, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> The pre-Albuquerque mailing is only about two weeks away, so I'd better
> stop sitting on this. Please see:
> http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html
> My hope is to publish this as P0096R5 in the mailing, and then update SD-6
> from that, preferably before the meeting (assuming I hear no objections).
> As always, the change indications are relative to the published SD-6. To
> make it easier to review recent technical changes, the relevant papers are
> listed below.
> There's one issue I'd like to specifically point out. For the new features
> added to the filesystem library, Jonathan suggested updating the value of
> __cpp_lib_filesystem to 201703. In what I have right now, two out of those
> three features are indicated by a value of 201606, just because that's the
> actual date of their adoption, and only the third is 201703. If there is a
> consensus that they should all be lumped together under a single value,
> I'll change it, but so far there has been only one comment by one person.
> (And later it would be easier for me to erase the distinction than to
> restore it.)
> Would anyone have any issues with this as a new revision of SD-6?
> Clark
> N4230
> N4366
> N4387
> N4510
> P0024
> P0028
> P0032
> P0040
> P0074
> P0127
> P0220
> P0254
> P0283
> P0295
> P0307
> P0336
> P0371
> P0386
> P0394
> P0618
> Transactional Memory
> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features

SG10 list run by sg10-owner@lists.isocpp.org