Subject: Re: [SG10] __has_include and __has_cpp_attribute
From: John Spicer (jhs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-07 11:10:35
> On May 7, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Since the replies have been unanimously positive, I have thrown together a draft of a paper for the post-meeting mailing.
> The bulk of it is just the descriptions from SD-6. Since Richard provided most of that text, I am inclined to list him as co-author. But I added a short introduction.
> Any comments?
Is the intent to get general feedback on the direction and then provide detailed wording if the direction is supported?
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: features-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:features-bounces_at_open-
>> std.org] On Behalf Of Nelson, Clark
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 8:54 AM
>> To: features_at_[hidden] (features_at_[hidden])
>> Subject: [SG10] __has_include and __has_cpp_attribute
>> At the meeting last night I mentioned a thought that was eluding
>> me at the
>> moment. I have remembered what it was.
>> We should consider adding __has_include and __has_cpp_attribute to
>> the C++17
>> standard. Would anyone in SG10 have any concerns about that
>> Clark Nelson Chair, PL22.16 (ANSI C++ standard
>> Intel Corporation Chair, SG10 (C++ SG for feature-testing)
>> clark.nelson_at_[hidden] Chair, CPLEX (C SG for parallel language
>> Features mailing list
> Features mailing list
SG10 list run by email@example.com