On 24 March 2015 at 01:36, Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Should TSes use the macro spelling pattern
>
> __cpp_experimental_whatever
>
> or
>
> __cpp_whatever
>
> assuming that the value of the macro will change anyway when a feature
> moves from TS land to the standard proper?
>

I'd rather that __cpp_experimental_whatever be reserved for library
features that are going into namespace std::experimental.

A different spelling for experimental language features is fine by me.
 Nevin :-)

-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  (847) 691-1404