On 24 March 2015 at 01:36, Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer@gmx.net> wrote:

Should TSes use the macro spelling pattern

__cpp_experimental_whatever

or

__cpp_whatever

assuming that the value of the macro will change anyway when a feature
moves from TS land to the standard proper?

I'd rather that __cpp_experimental_whatever be reserved for library features that are going into namespace std::experimental.

A different spelling for experimental language features is fine by me.

Nevin :-)

Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com> (847) 691-1404