On 02/03/2015 01:35 AM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> Here is an updated document. I have added __cpp_noexcept as Ed proposed, and
> __cpp_forward_decl_enum, as he appears to have proposed. Ed didn't seem to
> make any other positive proposals, but I received an independent suggestion
> about explicit conversion operators, so I have added it as well.

We did quite a bit of surgery to enumerations in C++11,
e.g. we can now have explicit base types and scoping etc.

I'm wondering why we're highlighting the "forward declaration"
part, as opposed to just "__cpp_extended_enum" or simply
"__cpp_enum", with suitably-changing values?

Thanks,
Jens