> I note you've added __cpp_lib_removed_* macros for removing library
> features; I thought the prevailing direction was that we didn't need them
> (code should be saying "is there a unique_ptr? if so, use it, otherwise use
> auto_ptr" or similar). Did we reverse that direction, or are these here
> just for consideration / reference?

Technically, as far as recent history is concerned, I didn't add them --
instead I forgot to delete them after we came to that conclusion. Thanks
for the catch.

> I have a slight preference for __cpp_explicit_conversion getting a trailing
> 's'.

Done.

> > If that day wouldn't be good, then we're probably looking at either March 9
> > (a Canadian holiday) or 23.

> I think either of these dates works for me.

That's good to know.

Clark