C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] Another update
From: Richard Smith (richard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-02 19:10:18

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé <kaballo86_at_[hidden]
> wrote:

> On 2/2/2015 9:35 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> > Apologies, especially to Ed, for the long silence.
> >
> > Here is an updated document.
> Apologies for coming late to the party (I have just subscribed to the
> reflector), but why was `__cpp_digit_separators` removed?

Because there is no reasonable way that code can use it to adapt to the
presence or absence of the feature.

Furthermore, N4277 (TriviallyCopyable reference_wrapper) has a
> question-mark next to "none". I see no reason for a macro for this
> feature, as it is intended to be detected via the corresponding trait.
> Incidentally, I was the author of such paper.
> Regards,
> --
> Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-
> http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features

SG10 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com