On 12/30/2014 05:07 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> On 12/29/2014 08:45 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
>> N3928 <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3928.pdf> Extending static_assert
>>
> Thank you for this. My first 0.02 * monetary_unit;
>
> For N3928 <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3928.pdf>Extending static_assert why not just bump up the date on |__cpp_static_assert?|

Strongly agreed.

> N4295 <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4295.html> - Folding expressions: [...] __cpp_fold_expressions is probably better.

Agreed.

> N4266 <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4266.html> - Attributes for namespaces and enumerators. They really are sort of two different things:
>
> __cpp_namespace_attributes 201411
> __cpp_enumerator_attributes 201411

Agreed.

There is a combinatorial space out there: Which attribute is supported in which
position (in general, not just namespaces/enumerators)? I don't think we want to go
there.

> "Wording for Forwarding References" is editorial I'm pretty sure

Yes, it is.

> as is

> "Cleanup for exception-specification and throw-expression"

Yes, indeed.

Jens