Subject: Re: [SG10] Updates to SD-6
From: Ed Smith-Rowland (3dw4rd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-30 10:07:44
On 12/29/2014 08:45 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> Extending static_assert
Thank you for this. My first 0.02 * monetary_unit;
static_assert why not just bump up the date on |__cpp_static_assert?|
Related to this I'm assuming an implementation is allowed to bump up the
date on a macro if they implement updates over several iterations of a
Users could be encouraged to check __cpp_feature >= <some_min_date> for
We could bump the date on |__cpp_unicode_literals for |- Scartch that -
that's for strings.
Just __cpp_utf8_char_literals I think.
Folding expressions: __cpp_parameter_pack_sorcery,
__cpp_fold_expressions is probably better.
Attributes for namespaces and enumerators. They really are sort of two
"Wording for Forwarding References" is editorial I'm pretty sure
as is "Cleanup for exception-specification and throw-expression"
Safe conversions in unique_ptr<T> -
A proposal to add invoke function template - __cpp_lib_invoke 201411.
N4280 - Non-member size() and more: __cpp_lib_nonmember_container_access
Contiguous Iterators - editorial.
I gotta run. I'll look and think about this more tonight.
SG10 list run by email@example.com