C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] Updates to SD-6
From: Ed Smith-Rowland (3dw4rd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-30 10:07:44

On 12/29/2014 08:45 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> N3928
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3928.pdf>
> Extending static_assert
Thank you for this. My first 0.02 * monetary_unit;

For N3928
static_assert why not just bump up the date on |__cpp_static_assert?|

Related to this I'm assuming an implementation is allowed to bump up the
date on a macro if they implement updates over several iterations of a
Users could be encouraged to check __cpp_feature >= <some_min_date> for

We could bump the date on |__cpp_unicode_literals for |- Scartch that -
that's for strings.
Just __cpp_utf8_char_literals I think.

<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4295.html> -
Folding expressions: __cpp_parameter_pack_sorcery,
__cpp_fold_expressions is probably better.

<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4266.html> -
Attributes for namespaces and enumerators. They really are sort of two
different things:

__cpp_namespace_attributes 201411
__cpp_enumerator_attributes 201411

"Wording for Forwarding References" is editorial I'm pretty sure
as is "Cleanup for exception-specification and throw-expression"

Safe conversions in unique_ptr<T[]> -

A proposal to add invoke function template - __cpp_lib_invoke 201411.

N4280 - Non-member size() and more: __cpp_lib_nonmember_container_access

Contiguous Iterators - editorial.

I gotta run. I'll look and think about this more tonight.

SG10 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com