Subject: Re: [SG10] Comments from Alisdair
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-23 12:04:13
> Do we want in the examples
> __has_include(<optional>), etc.
> __has_include(<experimental/optional>), etc.
> I thought the experimental headers aren't in with the std headers.
This is certainly on the long list of questions that arise as a result of all the work that the committee is doing on technical specifications. We'll be discussing that subject in Rapperswil.
SG10 list run by email@example.com