C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG10] Comments from Alisdair

From: Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 17:04:13 +0000
> Do we want in the examples
> __has_include(<optional>), etc.
> or
> __has_include(<experimental/optional>), etc.

> I thought the experimental headers aren't in with the std headers.

This is certainly on the long list of questions that arise as a result of all the work that the committee is doing on technical specifications. We'll be discussing that subject in Rapperswil.


Received on 2014-05-23 19:04:33