C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG10] Meeting

From: John Spicer <jhs_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:28:06 -0500
On Feb 12, 2014, at 2:46 AM, Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> If we are going to meet face-to-face this week, I guess it will have to be on Thursday sometime.
> But I'm starting to wonder whether it would make as much sense to schedule a teleconference instead.
> Any suggestions or requests?
> Is any of the work being carried out this week likely to result in a need for more feature-test macros? (Perhaps something in one of the TSes?)

That is the only thing I think might require a meeting. Otherwise, I'm fine with a conference call.

> I think the only other thing I'd mention in such a meeting would be that we shipped a compiler implementing N3745.

We have implemented (along with the clang version of the test mechanism in clang mode), but it has not shipped yet.


> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features

Received on 2014-02-12 13:28:12