"Nelson, Clark" <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> writes:

| Here is the current state of the recommendations. There are just two really
| significant changes:
|
| Based on the apparent consensus on the reflector, I deleted the macro for
| Benjamin's constexpr changes to the library.
|
| Thanks to Richard, we now have a reasonable starting point for a description
| of __has_include.
|
| Less significantly, there is a section for detailed rationale/examples for
| every change, although many of those sections are still virtually empty. I
| also added a paragraph to the preface explaining that WG21's approval, and
| stability requirements, apply only to section 2, the recommendations
| themselves, and not to the rationale or examples in section 1 or 3.
|
| If anyone sees anything wrong here, or has an example he wants to
| contribute, please send it to me. Tweaks accepted up until Tuesday morning.

it looks essentially ok to me.

-- Gaby