Subject: Re: [SG10] __cpp_lib_constexpr_functions
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-27 12:45:35
> My instance on having few macros isn't just specific to constexpr.
> For 'constexpr' in particular, I do believe it is still too early.
> doesn't even know what it wants. Having a new macro everytime that
> changes its mind sound overkill. If the desire is to have a macro
> anyway, then I will repeat the suggestion I made previously: Have
> just one
> macro for constexpr, call it something, and have its value updated
> new released of the committee draft.
Gaby, I don't understand what you're suggesting we should do.
Here is the relevant excerpt from N3694:
Constexpr Library Additions: utilities
Constexpr Library Additions: chrono
Constexpr Library Additions: containers
What are your proposed edits, if any?
SG10 list run by email@example.com