Great, thanks. They'll be part of an omnibus paper of all
status="Immediate" library issues (17 and counting). That will probably be
LWG poll 3 in the Saturday plenary.

On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 21:42, Robert Seacord <rcseacord_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I'm here in Issaquah and I'll keep an eye on these issues.
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023, 12:55 PM Jonathan Wakely via Liaison <
> liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> I would be very grateful if a WG14 expert could cast an eye over these
>> two issues which we hope to vote into C++23 on Saturday:
>>
>> Deprecate <stdalign.h> and <stdalign.h> macros
>> https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3827
>>
>> Sync intmax_t and uintmax_t with C2x
>> https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3828
>>
>> Both issues intend to align C++23 with changes happening in C23, so that
>> we aren't scrambling to catch up when we eventually rebase our normative
>> reference from C17 to C2x.
>>
>> The first one deprecates some macros that come from C, because if we
>> expect to remove them at some point in the future, we might as well let
>> users know that sooner rather than later.
>>
>> The second one is a "cherry pick" of a C2x change which would benefit C++
>> immediately, and we can do it now instead of waiting until we rebase on C2x.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Liaison mailing list
>> Liaison_at_[hidden]
>> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
>> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2023/02/1166.php
>>
>