On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:39 AM Christof Meerwald <cmeerw_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 08:37:13AM +0200, Corentin via Liaison wrote:
> > > P2320R0 (https://wg21.link/p2620r0) Lifting artificial restrictions on
> > > unviversal character names
> > > Proposes to relax a restriction that a universal character name cannot
> > > be used in place of a character in the basic character set, which is a
> > > restriction that C has but C++ does not. The author is looking for
> > > feedback on any concerns people have with unifying the behavior in
> > > both languages to match the C++ behavior.
> > >
> >
> > New revision which will be in the august mailing
> > https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2620R1.pdf
>
> I don't understand how the wording is supposed to work as you are
> still replacing universal-character-names in
> https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.3.sentence-6. Did you intend to
> change that?
>

Ugh, thanks for noticing that.
Yes, the intent was to remove that sentence entirely, and I can see how not
removing it could have led to a lot of confusion,
sorry about that.
The idea is that UCNs can ever appear in identifiers (and strings) and are
therefore only replaced there (Thanks Jens for the wording suggestion)


>
>
> Christof
>
> --
>
> https://cmeerw.org sip:cmeerw at cmeerw.org
> mailto:cmeerw at cmeerw.org xmpp:cmeerw at cmeerw.org
>