Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:39:35 +0200
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 08:37:13AM +0200, Corentin via Liaison wrote:
> > P2320R0 (https://wg21.link/p2620r0) Lifting artificial restrictions on
> > unviversal character names
> > Proposes to relax a restriction that a universal character name cannot
> > be used in place of a character in the basic character set, which is a
> > restriction that C has but C++ does not. The author is looking for
> > feedback on any concerns people have with unifying the behavior in
> > both languages to match the C++ behavior.
> >
>
> New revision which will be in the august mailing
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2620R1.pdf
I don't understand how the wording is supposed to work as you are
still replacing universal-character-names in
https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.3.sentence-6. Did you intend to
change that?
Christof
> > P2320R0 (https://wg21.link/p2620r0) Lifting artificial restrictions on
> > unviversal character names
> > Proposes to relax a restriction that a universal character name cannot
> > be used in place of a character in the basic character set, which is a
> > restriction that C has but C++ does not. The author is looking for
> > feedback on any concerns people have with unifying the behavior in
> > both languages to match the C++ behavior.
> >
>
> New revision which will be in the august mailing
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2620R1.pdf
I don't understand how the wording is supposed to work as you are
still replacing universal-character-names in
https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases#1.3.sentence-6. Did you intend to
change that?
Christof
-- https://cmeerw.org sip:cmeerw at cmeerw.org mailto:cmeerw at cmeerw.org xmpp:cmeerw at cmeerw.org
Received on 2022-08-10 09:39:38