C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] C and C++ Compatibility Oct Agenda

From: Aaron Ballman <compatibility.sg.chair_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 07:16:47 -0400
Reminder: there will be an SG22 telecon today in just under six hours
(at 17:00 UTC
Please see the agenda below for details.

Hope to see you there!


On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 2:45 PM Aaron Ballman
<compatibility.sg.chair_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Our next meeting will be on Fri Oct 1, 2021 at 17:00 UTC
> (https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20211001T170000&p1=tz_pt&p2=tz_mt&p3=tz_ct&p4=tz_et&p5=1440&p6=tz_cest).
> You can join the meeting at https://iso.zoom.us/j/5513145100 with the
> same password used as last time; please email me if you need the
> password.
> We will be discussing the following papers:
> WG14 N2757/P2390R1 (https://wg21.link/P2390R1) Add annotations for
> unreachable control flow
> P0627R5 (https://wg21.link/P0627R5) Function to mark unreachable code
> This is joint discussion of both the WG14 and WG21 proposals which
> propose adding a facility for marking that an expression is expected to
> be unreachable. The authors are primarily looking for design feedback.
> P2361R2 (http://wg21.link/P2361R2) Unevaluated string literals
> C and C++ have the notion of source and execution character sets, but
> have some string literals that are evaluated in neither, such as
> string literals used to emit diagnostics or within _Pragma. This paper
> proposes unevaluated string literals as a new kind of string literal
> for these purposes. The authors are primarily looking for design
> feedback.
> P2362R3 (https://wg21.link/P2362R3) Remove non-encodable wide
> character literals and multicharacter wide character literals
> Proposes adding restrictions to wide character literals so that use of
> unencodable characters or multiple characters in wide character
> literals is ill-formed. The authors do not anticipate this will break
> user code, but are looking for feedback on issues with the proposal
> for either users or implementers.
> Thanks!
> ~Aaron

Received on 2021-10-01 06:17:01