+1.

-- Gaby

-----Original Message-----
From: SG21 <sg21-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Jens Maurer via SG21
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:57 AM
To: liaison_at_[hidden]; Nevin Liber via SG21 <sg21_at_[hidden]>
Cc: Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [isocpp-sg21] [wg14/wg21 liaison] Telecon to review P2388R1 Minimum Contract Support: either Ignore or Check_and_abort

On 22/09/2021 12.54, Aaron Ballman via Liaison wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 4:20 AM Corentin via SG21 <sg21_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>> Please explain to me why we care in this specific context.
>> Never have we promised that C++N code would do something sensible when compiled as C++(N-1)
>
> WG21 does this routinely, as that is the expected outcome every time
> we move something at plenary as a Defect Report.

I'd hope that contracts, a new language feature, are not considered
a DR by any means.

Jens


_______________________________________________
SG21 mailing list
SG21_at_[hidden]
Subscription: https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.isocpp.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Fsg21&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cgdr%40microsoft.com%7Cd265d092f9fa4380b4ab08d97dd94fb9%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637679194576442112%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=2%2FQOI%2FqJKlBN6wyrnCKn1%2FvgyZqENdGiivcJhSHuFHI%3D&amp;reserved=0
Link to this post: https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.isocpp.org%2Fsg21%2F2021%2F09%2F1211.php&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cgdr%40microsoft.com%7Cd265d092f9fa4380b4ab08d97dd94fb9%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637679194576452108%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=P2SV%2B9WGV6OPpGMe2EzhM7eH5kUwP2ZkbMHcIGntEfQ%3D&amp;reserved=0