C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] [isocpp-sg21] Telecon to review P2388R1 Minimum Contract Support: either Ignore or Check_and_abort

From: Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:57:16 +0200
On 22/09/2021 12.54, Aaron Ballman via Liaison wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 4:20 AM Corentin via SG21 <sg21_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>> Please explain to me why we care in this specific context.
>> Never have we promised that C++N code would do something sensible when compiled as C++(N-1)
> WG21 does this routinely, as that is the expected outcome every time
> we move something at plenary as a Defect Report.

I'd hope that contracts, a new language feature, are not considered
a DR by any means.


Received on 2021-09-22 09:57:28