Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:05:52 +0100
On 26/02/2021 05.01, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:52 PM Jens Maurer via Liaison
> <liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> This functionality is equivalent to memset_s, so the proposal should
>> discuss why it doesn't simply make memset_s a non-optional part of C,
>> instead of introducing a new name.
>
> This was already discussed in WG14 and it was voted to go with the new
> name and new interface.
It would be great if a future updated paper reflected that state of
affairs.
Jens
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:52 PM Jens Maurer via Liaison
> <liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> This functionality is equivalent to memset_s, so the proposal should
>> discuss why it doesn't simply make memset_s a non-optional part of C,
>> instead of introducing a new name.
>
> This was already discussed in WG14 and it was voted to go with the new
> name and new interface.
It would be great if a future updated paper reflected that state of
affairs.
Jens
Received on 2021-02-26 01:05:57