Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 05:01:45 +0100
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:52 PM Jens Maurer via Liaison
<liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> This functionality is equivalent to memset_s, so the proposal should
> discuss why it doesn't simply make memset_s a non-optional part of C,
> instead of introducing a new name.
This was already discussed in WG14 and it was voted to go with the new
name and new interface.
Cheers,
Miguel
<liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> This functionality is equivalent to memset_s, so the proposal should
> discuss why it doesn't simply make memset_s a non-optional part of C,
> instead of introducing a new name.
This was already discussed in WG14 and it was voted to go with the new
name and new interface.
Cheers,
Miguel
Received on 2021-02-25 22:01:57