C++ Logo

liaison

Advanced search

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] labels

From: Uecker, Martin <Martin.Uecker_at_[hidden]>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:50:20 +0000

No. But this is for C++. The paper for C is
N2508 and was voted into C23 already
in August.

Best,
Martin


Am Montag, den 26.10.2020, 08:14 -0400 schrieb Barry Hedquist via Liaison:
> Will this break existing C code?
>
> Barry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Liaison [mailto:liaison-bounces_at_lists.isocpp.org] On Behalf Of
> > Uecker, Martin via Liaison
> > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 7:03 AM
> > To: liaison_at_[hidden]p.org; ville.voutilainen_at_gmail.com
> > Cc: Uecker, Martin
> > Subject: Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] labels
> >
> > Please a find attached version with a bit more introduction.
> >
> > Best,
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2020, 11:50 +0300 schrieb Ville Voutilainen:
> > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 09:57, Uecker, Martin via Liaison
> > > <liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > > Are there specific requirements for EWG papers?
> > >
> > > Not really, we haven't codified those (yet). Some observations:
> > >
> > > 1) we require the format to be plaintext, pdf, or html
> > > 2) that attached paper could use an introductory paragraph or two
> > > explaining what this is about, and why
> > >
> > > > I tried to wite down the wording changes for three alternative
> > > > options (still needs careful checking). I could add some intro and
> > > > discussion. Anything else?
> > >
> > > At this point, the rationale and cost/benefit analysis is more
> > > important than the wording mechanics.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Liaison mailing list
> Liaison_at_lists.isocpp.org
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2020/10/0223.php

Received on 2020-10-26 07:50:29