Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:14:06 -0400
Will this break existing C code?
Barry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liaison [mailto:liaison-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of
> Uecker, Martin via Liaison
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 7:03 AM
> To: liaison_at_[hidden]; ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]
> Cc: Uecker, Martin
> Subject: Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] labels
>
> Please a find attached version with a bit more introduction.
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2020, 11:50 +0300 schrieb Ville Voutilainen:
> > On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 09:57, Uecker, Martin via Liaison
> > <liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > Are there specific requirements for EWG papers?
> >
> > Not really, we haven't codified those (yet). Some observations:
> >
> > 1) we require the format to be plaintext, pdf, or html
> > 2) that attached paper could use an introductory paragraph or two
> > explaining what this is about, and why
> >
> > > I tried to wite down the wording changes for three alternative
> > > options (still needs careful checking). I could add some intro and
> > > discussion. Anything else?
> >
> > At this point, the rationale and cost/benefit analysis is more
> > important than the wording mechanics.
Barry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liaison [mailto:liaison-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of
> Uecker, Martin via Liaison
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 7:03 AM
> To: liaison_at_[hidden]; ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]
> Cc: Uecker, Martin
> Subject: Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] labels
>
> Please a find attached version with a bit more introduction.
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2020, 11:50 +0300 schrieb Ville Voutilainen:
> > On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 09:57, Uecker, Martin via Liaison
> > <liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > Are there specific requirements for EWG papers?
> >
> > Not really, we haven't codified those (yet). Some observations:
> >
> > 1) we require the format to be plaintext, pdf, or html
> > 2) that attached paper could use an introductory paragraph or two
> > explaining what this is about, and why
> >
> > > I tried to wite down the wording changes for three alternative
> > > options (still needs careful checking). I could add some intro and
> > > discussion. Anything else?
> >
> > At this point, the rationale and cost/benefit analysis is more
> > important than the wording mechanics.
Received on 2020-10-26 07:14:07