C++ Logo

std-discussion

Advanced search

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

[Potential defect] std::vector::push_back reallocation wording

Adequate for teaching?

Any progress with P0537? How to proceed?

extremely long compile time with large number of string literals

Hello std::discussion _ the OS C++/C compiler resuscitate.

IOStreams behavior definition

is this valid static const reference

It seems to a wording defect about template argument deduction for function parameter pack

Partial ordering of function template which have a place holder for deduced class type in the template parameter list.

std::make_shared and type deduction

The standard does not specify when to supply default arguments as template arguments

What is the difference between "Throws: Nothing." and noexcept(true)

Last message date: 2020-07-30 14:35:51