Subject: Re: Ideas on debug constexpr functions or other functions that have been 100% removed from the EXE
From: Matt Bentley (mattreecebentley_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-02-13 19:47:27
This could be tricky given that constexpr's aren't compile-time
guaranteed, hence there would be a necessary debug mechanism to
distinguish between constexpr's which are in fact being compile-time
evaluated and those which aren't. Which would be useful anyway, in my
opinion. I don't use them so am not sure whether any compiler ash that
On 14/02/2019 2:25 p.m., Scott Wardle wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> I was looking through C++ papers and since 2010 (and maybe before) not one iso C++ paper has been submitted on debugging. So maybe now is a good time to think about how we should debug C++ in a new way.
> To that end I had an idea the other day on debugging and wrote a blog on it and finally posted it. I donât see how this would effect the standard but it is quality of implementation idea.
> If we want to constexpr all of the things it would nice if we could printf debug at least. But my idea is maybe we can get the whole debugger to work.
> Check it out on my blog. http://www.swardle.com/sweb/blog5.html
> Tell me if you have any feedback (spelling grammar or good counter ideas that shows why the idea is not posable etc...)
> SG14 mailing list
SG14 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com
Older Archives on Google Groups