On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 14:25, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It's a question of one committee performing a syntactic and semantic
> land grab, and that constraining what the other committee
> can evolve their language to. That makes it a liaison concern. Thus my
> question whether this was ever discussed in a SG21
> meeting. Thus far I'll take these responses as a "no".

And before you ask why the Contracts study group should discuss it, I
mean SG22. :D