Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 06:05:14 -0700
On Wednesday, 2 July 2025 00:39:33 Pacific Daylight Time Andrey Semashev via
Std-Proposals wrote:
> I'd like to note that (u)intN_t reflect POSIX and C types, but I don't
> think the proposed shorter alternatives are defined in any relevant
> standard.
And in the absence of namespaces in C, it's rather unlikely the shorter forms
will be added to those standards.
Std-Proposals wrote:
> I'd like to note that (u)intN_t reflect POSIX and C types, but I don't
> think the proposed shorter alternatives are defined in any relevant
> standard.
And in the absence of namespaces in C, it's rather unlikely the shorter forms
will be added to those standards.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Principal Engineer - Intel Platform & System Engineering
Received on 2025-07-02 13:05:17