using namespace A if any_of{X, Y, Z}


One could see it as limitation of using namespace instead.


any_of loosely based on pattern matching proposals.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Andrew Tomazos via Std-Proposals <>
Gesendet: Do 27.04.2023 02:37
Betreff: Re: [std-proposals] Grouped-namespace "using" statements (floating the idea)
CC: Andrew Tomazos <>; John Filleau <>;
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:21 PM Arthur O'Dwyer via Std-Proposals <> wrote:
FWIW, I'm strongly opposed to this. (And I did a double-take at Barry's post: is it April Fool's Day already?)  C++ isn't Perl; we don't use Unix shell globs like that. In C++, curly braces have a couple of different meanings (code block, initializer-sequence), but not "shell glob."
using A::{X,Y,Z};
enum A {X,Y,Z};
Notice, both are comma-separated brace-enclosed lists of names.  Also, in both cases, each name is introduced into its parent scope.
A slight alteration we could consider would be:
using A {X,Y,Z};
(drop the extra ::), and then perhaps that seems more natural?
It's a common coding style to have a big block of usings at the top of a .cpp file.  This feature would significantly shorten that block.
 Std-Proposals mailing list