On Wed, 1 Mar 2023, 20:48 Ray Gardener via Std-Proposals, <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:Not gonna lie, if I see code exploiting integer overflow, I reject it. It just smells hoity-toity. I like code to be dead obvious.And as for assigning negative numbers to unsigned types, whatever happened to type safety?Would you prefer -1zu then? That's a literal of type size_t so there's no negative number and no question of it being not "type safe". It means exactly the same thing though.
Std-Proposals mailing list--
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals