Is even `std::any` a correct type erasure abstraction in this case?
if you want some arbitrary object and do some operations on it (`<<`
is only special case there)
then should https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p0957r5.pdf
be a better match?
Even better:
We do not need to — and should not — put anything like this in the Standard. It's got way too many "design knobs" (copyable? movable? immovable? short-buffer-optimized? in-place? trivially copyable? trivially relocatable?...), it is not a vocabulary type, and it is easy for any C++ programmer to write by hand when they need it.
–Arthur