On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:53 PM Andrew Tomazos via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 9:13 AM Kyle Knoepfel via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
auto value = value_at(.x=1, .y=2);

I think that syntax should be reserved for a future designated arguments feature. See D2288R0 here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14sQA95BVz8F7y-tqXxqXiRENvEusn8MzZgoBXMu4UbI

I have not been following this discussion, but from an outsider point of view:

. screams member access, not sure why would you want dot in a function argument syntax. Again I am open to being wrong, this is my reaction after reading proposal for 2 minutes. :)