Well... I think since capture-default is used, the intent is to want to capture. Thanks!

On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 9:52 PM Jason McKesson via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 9:44 AM blacktea hamburger via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
>
> The standard can specify that it is not captured.

Why bother? It won't actually affect any user-facing behavior. By
declaring your lambda with `[=]`, it is not captureless and therefore
cannot benefit from any captureless features. So besides adding more
exceptions to the language, how does it improve things?

>  I don't think it's good to pin hopes of optimization on implementations.

The avalanche has already started; it is too late for the pebbles to vote.
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals