Awesome, thank you very much.
On 04/01/2022 22.11, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals wrote:Honestly, I believe C++ should jumpstart to the next level instead of trying to copy other languages' features and should also retroactively fix its core memory management issues one way or the other. An axiom could be used to add implicit member variables as well to existing structures, which is a step forward for "intrusive reference counting" or a reference to an implicit "proxy" like C++ Superset does. Again, otherwise I'll tend to agree with Linus Torvalds when he said that "C++ fixes the wrong problems". On 1/4/22 3:56 PM, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals wrote:I just saw that the C++23 "Reflection" will be capable of scanning all object members so maybe that can be an alternative or maybe not: https://www.infoworld.com/article/3528882/c-plus-plus-20-spec-finalized-c-plus-plus-23-spec-begins.htmlThe use-cases you've presented are expected to be addressed by reflection in a principled manner. This paper might be a good starting point: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2320r0.pdf Reflection likely won't make it into C++23. Jens
|
|
|||||||
Le message ci-dessus,
ainsi que les documents l'accompagnant, sont destinés
uniquement aux personnes identifiées et peuvent contenir
des informations privilégiées, confidentielles ou ne
pouvant être divulguées. Si vous avez reçu ce message par
erreur, veuillez le détruire.This communication (and/or the attachments) is intended for named recipients only and may contain privileged or confidential information which is not to be disclosed. If you received this communication by mistake please destroy all copies. |
||||||||