Is it worth asking whether random-access sized but not-common ranges are still a corner case with `any_view`?

What about the path of enforcing commonness for random-access sized ranges by having `ranges::end` return `ranges::begin(r) + ranges::size(r)`?

On 11 Oct 2026, at 17:34, Hewill Kang via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue4003

This is not the design direction preferred by the LEWG.

Daniel Pfeifer via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> 於 2026年10月11日週日下午8:47寫道：
While using `any_view`, I was surprised that `back()` cannot be made available with any combination of view options, because `view_interface::back()` is only provided for common views and `any_view` is never common.

There is only a small change necessary: https://purplekarrot.github.io/wg21-papers/d0000.html

Feedback or guidance how to proceed with that suggestion appreciated.
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals

--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals